HP HPE-510f

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP HPE-510f  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 14:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 47.7
2-Core 96.8
48% 74.5 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 248
26% 206 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Device(1B0A 9091) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 9.2.0.0
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7
Parallax 5.7
6% 6.5 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 6.4
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 39 39 40 40 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 70.6
Write 40.6
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 39.3
31% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.5% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.9
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HPE-510f Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP HPE-510f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback