Biostar A320MH

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Biostar A320MH (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191106
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '21 at 14:25
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$112 52,721 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 110 2-Core 218 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 644 65% 529 Pts	64-Core 847 52% 847 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 220 1,709 User benchmarks, average bench 1% XFX(1682 5220) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.07% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.07% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 240GB 240GB 2,483 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8312c20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 356 358 358 358 178 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 481 Write 377 Mixed 350 SusWrite 326 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 67.2 4K Mixed 32 113% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 171 131% 175 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 93%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 275GB free Firmware: 01.01S03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 111 112 110 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 115 Write 99.5 Mixed 97.2 SusWrite 111 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 76%
WD Elements 2621 1TB 6,342 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 88GB free, PID 2621 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 113 111 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	56% Above average	Read 127 Write 112 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 112 141% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.3 156% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CB8GU2400.C8ET 1x8GB 1,105 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	44.6% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 14.1 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 14.9 46% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 83 48% 83 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
5%	4%	28	9	6	60	21.5"	1920 1080	SAM0AE5 S22C150

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	266x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	196x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	124x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	128x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	125x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	111x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	114x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	77x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	47x

RAM
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 40,300 samples	48x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	44x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBTeamBench 78%, 7,481 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $333

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16