Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics95.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 13:24
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 223
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 676
66% 539 Pts
64-Core 1,085
67% 1,085 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.6% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 129
Parallax 130
97% 126 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 125
Splatting 108
93% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N600 480GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1217A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 203 123 100 98 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 480
Write 412
Mixed 352
SusWrite 152
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 35.6
119% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 249
201% 281 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 100%
Klevv NEO N600 480GB
109GB free
Firmware: O1217A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 226 99 100 100 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 446
Write 328
Mixed 369
SusWrite 157
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 37.3
124% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 254
206% 288 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IM4AGU88A30-FGGHMB 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 27.8
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 23.7
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $1,069
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback