| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 0.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
| System | Toshiba PORTEGE T230 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | TOSHIBA NDU10 |
| Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100907 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 29 '21 at 13:08 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | MYS-User |
| Background CPU | 98% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium U5400
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
|
27.7%
Poor
|
28% 42.9 Pts
|
8% 57.1 Pts
|
3% 53.2 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FDA0) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
|
0.32%
Terrible
|
0% 0.43 fps
| ||
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 120 162 81 107 118 MB/s
|
32.8%
Below average
|
38% 171 MB/s
|
42% 14.3 MB/s
|
52% 88.1 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CF8 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
13.7%
Very poor
|
14% 4.73 GB/s
|
8% 2.77 GB/s
|
23% 176 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PORTEGE T230 Builds (Compare 1 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba PORTEGE T230
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |