Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C855-26P (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PLCSF8
Memory	3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	8.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '21 at 10:12
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 84.2 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 156 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 207 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500/7600 2,324 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	3.3% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 5.2 Parallax 3.5 3% 4.27 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 3 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.3% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 287GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX003M SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 55 68 59 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 56 Write 63.4 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 56.1 37% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-CK0 6GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	42.6% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 13.4 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD038E

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16