Acidanthera iMac14,4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcidanthera iMac14,4  (all builds)
MotherboardAcidanthera Mac-81E3E92DD6088272
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 09:19
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 209
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 517
54% 435 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Dell(1028 0577) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.8
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsweet PM863 240GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 143 141 135 129 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 444
Write 376
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 176
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 2.3
30% 9.17 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 30
75% 150 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 76%
SFSA240GQ1AA4TO-C-HC-216-NOV 240GB
0GB free
Firmware: SBR13025
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 414
Write 307
Mixed 289
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 26.1
92% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 75.5
DQ Mixed 100
83% 124 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-016.A00LF Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB KVT8FP-HYC KVT8FP-HYC 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.8
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac14,4 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acidanthera iMac14,4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback