HP 550-154l

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 550-154l  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B47
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 08:40
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 174
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 306
42% 309 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.81% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.7
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.5
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.81%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS100T2G0A- 1TB
857GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 0.9 1 100 26 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 258
Write 327
Mixed 166
SusWrite 50.4
148% 200 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
206% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 159%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
565GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 166 165 163 162 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 153
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 164
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Ramaxel RMR5030ME68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM04FD SAMSUNG
Typical 550-154l Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-154l

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $51
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback