Cyberpowerpc Fangbook HX6

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Cyberpowerpc Fangbook HX6 (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150724
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '21 at 22:47
Run Duration	320 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4910MQ-$110 6,703 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 75.4 1-Core 108 2-Core 216 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 536 57% 456 Pts	64-Core 523 32% 523 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M 73,363 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Device(1D05 100E) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212 Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Lighting 22.9 Reflection 18.4 Parallax 22.8 19% 21.4 fps	MRender 24.5 Gravity 21.6 Splatting 0.1 11% 15.4 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S256G1122 256GB 160 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3540000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 7.2 50 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 455 Write 206 Mixed 219 SusWrite 20.4 49% 225 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 26 93% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 134 135% 222 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 97%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 240GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 76 80 80 81 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 120 Write 67.7 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 70.8 53% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Team-Elite-1600 2x8GB 3,520 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.4% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 16 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 10.9 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 89.6 45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	5	60	23.8"	1280 720	DELD0DA DELL P2419H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Fangbook HX6 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Cyberpowerpc Fangbook HX6

CPU
Core i7-4710MQIntel $44Bench 60%, 15,557 samples	4x
Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	4x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	1x

SSD
SD7SN6S256G1122 256GBSandiskBench 79%, 160 samples	1x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 52%, 1,183 samples	2x
Team-Elite-1600 2x8GBTeamBench 54%, 3,520 samples	1x
99U5428-078.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 707 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $44

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48