Oegstone BOAMOT-500

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Oegstone BOAMOT-500 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK PRIME A320M-R
Memory	22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200710
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '21 at 21:17
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	73%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G Vega Graphics 1,132 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 58.5 1-Core 93.8 2-Core 156 58% 103 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 316 44% 327 Pts	64-Core 340 21% 340 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8767) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.7% Average	Lighting 66.6 Reflection 67.4 Parallax 63.7 54% 65.9 fps	MRender 57.5 Gravity 63.7 Splatting 0.3 29% 40.5 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 62%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 217 223 216 214 215 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 363 Write 254 Mixed 232 SusWrite 220 60% 267 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 50.1 4K Mixed 27.1 95% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 285 DQ Mixed 143 154% 259 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G6J1 2x16GB 468 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 27.3 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 13.1 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 49: 8R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
49%	22%	69	263	172	60	24"	1920 1080	IVM6138 PL2483H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical BOAMOT-500 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Oegstone BOAMOT-500

CPU
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G Vega GraphicsAMDBench 71%, 1,132 samples	5x
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G Vega GraphicsAMDBench 70%, 3,488 samples	3x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	2x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
R9 290XAMD $549Bench 51%, 37,353 samples	1x

SSD
WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GBWDCBench 87%, 12,305 samples	2x
CS900 480GBPNY $35Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	1x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	1x

RAM
CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 1x8GBCrucialBench 43%, 3,932 samples	4x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	1x
CT16G4DFD8266.C16FE 1x16GBCrucialBench 46%, 1,081 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16