Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '21 at 18:18
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 85.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
87% 158 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 506
68% 505 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1314 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.9.2
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.4% Average
Lighting 55.7
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 75.4
45% 63.5 fps
MRender 56.2
Gravity 57.7
Splatting 45
43% 53 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 372 368 357 358 367 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 411
Write 371
Mixed 342
SusWrite 365
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 37.3
138% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 190
142% 187 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 101%
TOSHIBA silicon-power 32GB
29GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 4.5 10 12 9.7 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
9.02% Terrible
Read 37.2
Write 20.9
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 9.4
21% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
23% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.02%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.1% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 21.8
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 21.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 144 23.5" 1280 720 ACR074D KG241Q S
Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback