PC NH5x_7xDPx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics94.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemPC NH5x_7xDPx  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo NHxxDPx
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '21 at 16:03
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 241
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 936
87% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,017
63% 1,017 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 50F3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.5% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 123
Parallax 128
100% 125 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 94.8
Splatting 82.6
83% 105 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
504GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 157 159 161 159 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 485
Write 169
Mixed 157
SusWrite 159
53% 242 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 25.7
99% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 165
134% 194 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GE2666C18S4 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 27.1
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 27.6
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 2R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 16% 38 9 7 144 17.3" 1920 1080 LGD065B
History: Score 8: 1R 0G 3B | Score 18: 2R 2G 2B
Typical NH5x_7xDPx Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

System: PC NH5x_7xDPx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback