HP Laptop 15-bw0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15-bw0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8330
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191203
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 27 '21 at 19:20
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 83
41% 65.3 Pts
4-Core 67.5
8-Core 65.4
9% 66.4 Pts
64-Core 85.7
5% 85.7 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
HP(103C 8330) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.78% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 4.4
2% 4.03 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 3
Splatting 5.1
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.78%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB-$82
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SB4OC7DP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 21 27 27 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 36.1
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 24.9
20% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:0x0205 PSD48G240081S 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15DC
Typical Laptop 15-bw0xx Builds (Compare 705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-bw0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback