MSI X99S GAMING 9 ACK (MS-7882)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7882
MotherboardMSI X99S GAMING 9 ACK (MS-7882)  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 27 '21 at 18:50
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 137
2-Core 270
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 820
81% 664 Pts
64-Core 1,080
67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 4076) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3650 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 182
Parallax 177
163% 186 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 146
Splatting 124
124% 155 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 140%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 736 415 416 414 415 417 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,557
Write 2205
Mixed 1,559
SusWrite 469
378% 1,698 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 92.4
316% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 752
DQ Mixed 883
659% 880 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 268%
Great: 302%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
63GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 110 99 99 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 192
Write 125
Mixed 144
SusWrite 105
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 31
134% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 91.9
80% 119 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
92GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1098 328 326 326 327 325 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 2,070
Write 1,466
Mixed 573
SusWrite 455
252% 1141 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 55.4
235% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,038
DQ Write 952
DQ Mixed 653
584% 881 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 226%
Great: 236%
Hitachi HTS545025B9SA00 250GB
71GB free
Firmware: C64G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 56 56 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 54.2
Write 43.4
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 55.5
33% 45.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 47%
Vaseky V800/256GB 256GB
180GB free
Firmware: 2A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 384 384 385 386 383 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
213GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
49% Average
Read 96
Write 99.3
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 74.6
60% 81 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 49%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$7
1GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37
Write 26
Mixed 19.5
32% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.9
167% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2800 2OZ 5x4GB
5 of 8 slots used
20GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 44.9
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 36.2
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 23.8
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 53.7
74% 53.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM775B LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical X99S GAMING 9 ACK (MS-7882) Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X99S GAMING 9 ACK (MS-7882)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback