PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3LR (all builds) |
Memory | 2.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100422 |
Uptime | 79.7 Days |
Run Date | Sep 27 '21 at 16:02 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
46.2%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 169 169 158 219 199 MB/s
|
47.9%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS723015BLA642 1.5TB
954GB free
Firmware: MN5OA5Q0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 117 117 118 116 MB/s
|
64.9%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
|
20.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
31% | 24% | 46 | 108 | 6 | 60 | 21.5" | 1920 1080 | AOC2250 2250W |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 15x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 12x |
Xeon E5440IntelBench 49%, 3,689 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 9500 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 27,834 samples | 5x |
HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples | 4x |
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |