Lenovo 81WD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 81WD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 27 '21 at 00:43
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 119
2-Core 201
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 269
39% 286 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400 128GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0401A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 142 137 149 222 354 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.5% Good
Read 401
Write 320
Mixed 315
SusWrite 191
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 17.3
86% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 36.4
83% 167 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 65%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 85 78 98 96 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 125
Write 103
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 92.3
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
189% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
75.7% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 23.7
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 64 0" 1366 768
Typical 81WD Builds (Compare 904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81WD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback