Lenovo 10AXS02J00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10AXS02J00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 19:32
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 70.1
2-Core 145
60% 99.2 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 279
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Legend(17AA 309E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5180
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.7
3% 4.27 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsun 840 EVO 120G 120GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 478
Write 459
Mixed 314
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 54.6
196% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 178
184% 300 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 17.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10AXS02J00 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AXS02J00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback