ECT One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics94.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemECT One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star B450-A PRO MAX (MS-7B86)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 16:08
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 130
55% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 648
49% 443 Pts
64-Core 1,097
68% 1,097 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.9.1
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.5% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 141
Parallax 182
96% 147 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 127
Splatting 94.6
91% 113 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 139 116 117 115 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 463
Mixed 409
SusWrite 178
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 52.7
174% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 373
280% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 102%
Great: 134%
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 426 440 433 427 435 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 479
Mixed 355
SusWrite 436
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 43.3
156% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 242
211% 315 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 109%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 29.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 25.9
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 100 34" 1280 720 AOC3402 U34G2G1
Typical One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO

System: ECT One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $872
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback