HP Laptop 15-bs0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Laptop 15-bs0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 832A
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 15:03
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 149
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 251
34% 252 Pts
64-Core 258
16% 258 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 832A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
784GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1R4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 82 82 88 84 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 105
Write 80
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 84.4
55% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 62%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234, off brand
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.7 7.5 4.3 11 6.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 17.7
Write 7.2
Mixed 11.9
SusWrite 7.5
14% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.1
152% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 12%
VendorCo ProductCode 2TB
2TB free, PID 1234, off brand
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 21.1
Write 14.2
SusWrite 14.3
20% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
48% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 12%
WD My Book 25ED 8TB
6TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 184 187 191 186 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 186
Write 185
Mixed 128
SusWrite 185
231% 171 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.7
217% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 859B CT8G4SFS824A.M8FB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.1% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 20.5
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 21.1
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 46 3 60 15.5" 1093 614 AUO10EC
Typical Laptop 15-bs0xx Builds (Compare 3,745 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-bs0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback