Hp-pavilion FL387AA-ABZ a6665it

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion FL387AA-ABZ a6665it  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080905
Uptime23.6 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 11:45
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 55
34% 48.6 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 107
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.2% Poor
Lighting 29.8
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 38.3
24% 33.3 fps
MRender 41.5
Gravity 39
Splatting 31.8
30% 37.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250823AS 250GB-$99
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 32 31 48 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 11.2
Write 7.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 30
11% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
37% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.7
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 21.6" 1280 720 HWP280B HP w2216
Typical FL387AA-ABZ a6665it Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion FL387AA-ABZ a6665it

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback