Metabox Alpha-S NP70HP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMetabox Alpha-S NP70HP  (all builds)
MotherboardIT NP5x_NP6x_NP7xHP
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210604
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 09:39
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 68.2
1-Core 172
2-Core 336
100% 192 Pts
4-Core 641
8-Core 1,120
106% 880 Pts
64-Core 1,469
91% 1,469 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 94%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 867B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 168
Parallax 122
109% 141 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 99
Splatting 85.5
86% 108 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Metabox Performance 1TB PCIe NVME SSD
593GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM53.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1389 1700 1040 176 110 203 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,410
Write 1,904
Mixed 1,313
SusWrite 770
304% 1,349 MB/s
4K Read 52.2
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 78.8
295% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 1,096
DQ Mixed 868
663% 881 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 233%
Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 14.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 12.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 1R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 19% 21 108 6 144 17.2" 1920 1080 CMN175C
Typical Alpha-S NP70HP Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: Metabox Alpha-S NP70HP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback