Asrock A320M-DGS

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-DGS (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170718
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '17 at 01:57
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$131 70,038 User benchmarks, average bench 66% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 75.2 1-Core 114 2-Core 212 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 604 62% 498 Pts	64-Core 604 37% 604 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 158 Reflection 208 Parallax 184 129% 184 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 183 Splatting 127 119% 147 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 22215406 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 28329604285562 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 136 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 27 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 63 90198442012 (C2) HDA temperature 28 63 90198442012 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 22215406 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 22215406 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 22215406 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 77309411328 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2387 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1688 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1688 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1150 (F4) Unknown 100 100 3080207	61.9% Good	Read 513 Write 114 Mixed 160 57% 262 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 90.7 4K Mixed 11.6 103% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 97.2 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 12.5 39% 83 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 272GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 170 4250 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1546 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 10143 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1116 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 144 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 163 163 111786 (C2) HDA temperature 122 82 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 181 10375 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67.9% Good	Read 129 Write 107 Mixed 110 87% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.18 99% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 85%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 141GB free Firmware: CR100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7360 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7125 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10728 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2078 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 56 22 (C2) HDA temperature 172 106 22 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 396511 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	27.1% Poor	Read 49.1 Write 45 Mixed 44.2 35% 46.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.31 68% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD2 16GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	87.1% Excellent	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 29.6 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 26.4 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 90 44% 90 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	69x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	65x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	50x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	81x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	12x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16