Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus Z10PE-D16 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z10PE-D16 WS
Memory	60.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190612
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '21 at 04:49
Run Duration	273 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 1,710 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 69.4 1-Core 82.5 2-Core 179 62% 110 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 564 54% 446 Pts	64-Core 1,646 102% 1,646 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 1257 MHz, MLim: 455 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.28% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 5 Parallax 5.4 4% 5.17 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 6.5 4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.28% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$117 5,089 User benchmarks, average bench 360% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2224 2179 2191 2192 2279 2164 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	292% Outstanding	Read 1,718 Write 2,020 Mixed 1,688 SusWrite 2,205 432% 1,908 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 116 4K Mixed 61.8 201% 72.5 MB/s	DQ Read 698 DQ Write 472 DQ Mixed 605 446% 592 MB/s
Poor: 194% ↑ This bench: 292% Great: 496%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 662GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 383 385 385 389 385 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Read 350 Write 374 Mixed 348 SusWrite 386 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 35.5 141% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 222 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 255 186% 240 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 237GB free Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 439 441 441 447 375 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 422 Write 420 Mixed 346 SusWrite 432 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 89.1 4K Mixed 42.2 152% 54.9 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 352 265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 432GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 373 374 375 378 376 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 346 Write 370 Mixed 330 SusWrite 376 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 45.9 154% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 192 160% 230 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 126%
SanDisk Cruzer Mini 1GB 225 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 5150 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.8 3.9 4 3.9 3.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	3% Terrible	Read 8.5 Write 3.5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 3.8 6% 5 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x16GB 9,153 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 22.4 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.7 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	23.5"	1280 720	AOC2470 2470W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z10PE-D16 WS Builds (Compare 285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 72%

Battleship

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

System: Asus Z10PE-D16 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v31stBench 66%, 886 samples	24x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples	22x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples	17x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	26x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	22x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	18x

SSD
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)WD $74Bench 277%, 114,373 samples	11x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x

RAM
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	26x
HMA84GR7MFR4N-TF 4x31.8GBHynixBench 85%, 82 samples	11x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16