HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 85FF
Memory	2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210119
Uptime	7.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '21 at 01:04
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	31.1% Below average	Memory 46.5 1-Core 23.2 2-Core 44.6 26% 38.1 Pts	4-Core 86.2 8-Core 128 13% 107 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% HP(103C 85FF) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7196 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	11.2% Very poor	Lighting 13.6 Reflection 12.4 Parallax 12.6 11% 12.9 fps	MRender 20.5 Gravity 10.7 Splatting 11.9 11% 14.4 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB 20,171 User benchmarks, average bench 174% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD70H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 248 242 240 232 227 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Read 983 Write 832 Mixed 702 SusWrite 271 156% 697 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 35.6 4K Mixed 29.4 99% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 173 129% 172 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 235%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 787GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 120 130 126 131 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 129 Write 119 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 127 72% 99.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB 48,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	MC Read 16 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 11.8 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 8.5 23% 8.13 GB/s	Latency 174 23% 174 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 59: 10R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
59%	12%	112	99	62	60	17.3"	1920 1080	BOE0825

History: Score 24: 3R 1G 6B | Score 59: 10R 3G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx Builds (Compare 1,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 17-cd0xxx

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	482x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	429x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples	132x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	524x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	252x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 57%, 12,899 samples	198x

SSD
hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GBSKBench 131%, 6,904 samples	145x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	95x
TOSHIBA 512GBKbg30zmv512gBench 122%, 10,256 samples	62x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	218x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	68x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16