Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150926
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 26 '21 at 00:12
Run Duration	324 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 1,588 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 71.2 2-Core 137 58% 95.9 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 241 32% 238 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Lighting 20 Reflection 18.9 Parallax 19.2 16% 19.4 fps	MRender 23 Gravity 21.3 Splatting 15.4 16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM851a 2.5 7mm 1024GB 306 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 759GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 353 383 395 400 406 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Read 418 Write 364 Mixed 285 SusWrite 387 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 73.5 4K Mixed 33 119% 43.8 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 302 239% 333 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GB 1,961 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.9% Very good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 34.7 MC Mixed 27.4 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 16.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 80.9 49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 20: 2R 1G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
20%	20%	50	191	156	165	27"	1920 1080	MSI3CA5 MSI MAG272C

History: Score 32: 3R 4G 5B | Score 36: 5R 2G 5B | Score 28: 3R 4G 1B | Score 22: 3R 1G 4B | Score 20: 2R 1G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	1,243x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	958x
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples	411x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	417x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	386x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	287x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	105x
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	349x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	209x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16