Asus X541UAK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus X541UAK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X541UAK
Memory18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 22:49
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 180
75% 126 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 278
38% 282 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 1670) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9922
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 7.1
5% 6.47 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 6
Splatting 13.3
8% 9.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
851GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 393 391 415 408 396 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 450
Mixed 358
SusWrite 396
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 37.6
134% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 287
230% 324 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6MFR8N-TF 859B CT16G4SFD832A.M16FRS 24GB
2133, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.6% Very good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 23
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 22.3
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X541UAK Builds (Compare 665 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X541UAK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback