Dell Inspiron 5565

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Inspiron 5565  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0RVKF9
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161212
Uptime5.7 Days
Run DateAug 15 '17 at 00:10
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9700P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Memory 29.2
1-Core 45.3
2-Core 82.9
29% 52.5 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 137
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Dell(1028 0769) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
2.59% Terrible
Lighting 3.17
Reflection 3.96
Parallax 4
3% 3.71 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 3.61
3% 3.11 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.59%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 439
Write 227
Mixed 252
67% 306 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 3.49
21% 6.94 MB/s
DQ Read 11
DQ Write 24.6
DQ Mixed 15.1
12% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 1200 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 259
15% 259 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 18%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 5565 Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 5565

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback