Lenovo 81Y4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 81Y4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 20:59
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 127
57% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 391
38% 312 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3FA3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 30
Parallax 4
3% 12.5 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 6.1
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002P6LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 919 924 885 740 776 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 1,364
Write 985
Mixed 917
SusWrite 723
223% 997 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 60.3
201% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 431
DQ Write 493
DQ Mixed 262
253% 396 MB/s
Poor: 96%
This bench: 182%
Great: 238%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston LV32D4S2S8HD-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 12.3
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 81.4
49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E7
Typical 81Y4 Builds (Compare 6,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81Y4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback