ECT ONE GAMING Starter AO04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemECT ONE GAMING Starter AO04  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B350-PLUS
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180205
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 18:05
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 80.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 223
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 650
69% 548 Pts
64-Core 890
55% 890 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.9.2
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 30.9
18% 26.2 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 25
Splatting 20.3
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM71.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 140 24 5.3 9.4 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 342
Write 100
Mixed 145
SusWrite 42.6
34% 158 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 24
106% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 142
131% 197 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 83%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
509GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 140 141 142 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 176
Write 176
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 138
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 33.5
106% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 26.5
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 25% 4 82 8 60 27" 1920 1080 SAM0D45 C27F398
Typical ONE GAMING Starter AO04 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: ECT ONE GAMING Starter AO04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback