Acer Aspire 7745G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire 7745G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JV71-CP
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 15:30
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 54.4
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 105
44% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 151
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Acer(1025 0368) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
6.94% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 9.3
8% 8.8 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 6.4
6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.94%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 168 177 126 143 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.4% Average
Read 218
Write 199
Mixed 169
SusWrite 141
41% 181 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 19.5
61% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 149
113% 153 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.1% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 7745G Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 7745G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback