bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory31GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory13.6 GB free of 31 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1306 x 767 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 14:13
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 116
50% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 503
43% 367 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 71%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 35 119 24 13 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 118
Write 176
Mixed 177
SusWrite 41.2
97% 128 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 6.4
1,087% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 31GB
0, 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 8192, 4096, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 20
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback