Lenovo 36852BG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 36852BG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36852BG
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 12:22
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Memory 50.6
1-Core 11.3
2-Core 12.8
21% 24.9 Pts
4-Core 29.3
8-Core 22.4
4% 25.8 Pts
64-Core 3.1
0% 3.1 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Legend(17AA 5107) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032A7E380 320GB
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GGBZBF40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 49 52 43 37 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 74.2
Write 50.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 40.9
33% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
29% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33%
Great: 44%
SDHC Card 4GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 3.4 7.6 2.8 4.9 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Read 3.9
Write 4.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.5
6% 4.52 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.46% Terrible
MC Read 1.7
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 3.4
6% 2.27 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 0.8
3% 0.97 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 7.46%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 36852BG Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 36852BG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback