Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics2.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-PRO GAMER  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 11:32
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770S-$112
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 221
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 556
60% 480 Pts
64-Core 558
35% 558 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.63% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 1.3
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 3.1
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.63%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron M600 SATA M.2 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MA01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 152 152 152 150 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 416
Write 412
Mixed 341
SusWrite 170
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 35.1
146% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 234
207% 309 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.8
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 18.5" 1280 720 GSM5ACB LG HD
Typical Z97-PRO GAMER Builds (Compare 2,900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-PRO GAMER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback