MSI H67MA-ED55 (MS-7676)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics40.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7676
MotherboardMSI H67MA-ED55 (MS-7676)  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 10:49
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3225-$325
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 165
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 235
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.7% Average
Lighting 48.9
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 71
40% 59.7 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 54.9
Splatting 43.8
42% 52.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU750 512GB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA001R29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 386 398 403 407 405 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 403
Mixed 385
SusWrite 391
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 34.6
131% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 280
218% 298 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5595-005.A00LF 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67MA-ED55 (MS-7676) Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H67MA-ED55 (MS-7676)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $455
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback