Toshiba Satellite Pro C50-A

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite Pro C50-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130610
Uptime	5.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '21 at 09:19
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100 61,311 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 82.5 2-Core 142 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 200 28% 204 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.19% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.7 3% 2.8 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.7 3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.19% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 363GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 387 402 438 421 421 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Read 443 Write 424 Mixed 369 SusWrite 417 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 52.2 4K Mixed 35.1 113% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 356 265% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 Samsung M471B5273EB0-YK0 8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	56.4% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 17.8 56% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 16.5 46% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD033B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite Pro C50-A Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite Pro C50-A

CPU
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	9x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	6x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	9x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	7x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
Trion 150 240GBOCZ $196Bench 79%, 15,660 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 M471B5273EB0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 44%, 25 samples	2x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	2x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 16GBHynixBench 52%, 476 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $133

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16