Asus PRIME Z490-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z490-A  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 06:14
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 154
2-Core 305
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 1,142
104% 873 Pts
64-Core 1,646
102% 1,646 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 203
Parallax 126
102% 151 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 134
Splatting 121
100% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Viper M.2 VPN100 512GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,021
Write 1,291
Mixed 1,091
255% 1,134 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 58.8
188% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 736
DQ Write 421
DQ Mixed 234
266% 464 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 253%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
50GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 346 318 321 307 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 472
Mixed 442
SusWrite 316
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 52.4
169% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 353
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
12GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 490
Write 463
Mixed 408
101% 454 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 53.5
174% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 348
263% 353 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 170 168 170 169 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 164
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 167
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
163GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 83 83 83 83 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 84.2
Write 85.2
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 82.2
59% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 84%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-00A0RT0 500GB
9GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 37 36 35 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 31.4
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 35.2
44% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Thermaltake R009D408GX2-4600C19A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 45.8
MC Mixed 29.6
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 48.4
SC Mixed 31.5
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 51.9
77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 240 27" 1280 720 DELA147 Dell AW2720HF
Typical PRIME Z490-A Builds (Compare 7,387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z490-A - $265

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback