Maxsun MS-TZZ A10 Quad Super V2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMaxsun MS-TZZ A10 Quad Super V2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardMAXSUN MS-TZZ A10 Quad Super V2.0
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 03:56
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD RX-425BB R6 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 45.9
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 93.5
39% 65.4 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 157
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
AMD(1002 131D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
4.82% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 8.3
5% 7.2 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 6.8
5% 6.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.82%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 348 355 349 356 359 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 424
Write 351
Mixed 143
SusWrite 345
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 8.8
52% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 18.9
42% 88.4 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown U3A4G93-13G9BE3B00 SH564568FH8N0QHSCR 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.3
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 21.5" 1280 720 AOC2242 T2242we
Typical MS-TZZ A10 Quad Super V2.0 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Maxsun MS-TZZ A10 Quad Super V2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback