HP Z840 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z840 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2129
Memory119.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 00:35
Run Duration445 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
CPU0, 1 CPU, 22 cores, 44 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 234
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 752
71% 591 Pts
64-Core 2624
162% 2624 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon-VII-$841
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.Q2.1
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 110
Parallax 203
107% 148 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 146
Splatting 84.7
90% 112 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1443 1329 1256 1356 1415 1423 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2,301
Write 1,190
Mixed 1,106
SusWrite 1,371
332% 1,492 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 66.7
230% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 690
DQ Write 604
DQ Mixed 624
474% 639 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 276%
Great: 393%
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
599GB free
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2087 2134 2107 2107 2098 2083 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 1,559
Write 1,992
Mixed 1,593
SusWrite 2,103
411% 1,812 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 64.8
211% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 709
516% 675 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 286%
Great: 472%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 19TB
17.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 450 450 457 461 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 425
Write 401
Mixed 136
SusWrite 455
80% 354 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 3.2
33% 9.2 MB/s
DQ Read 67.8
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 3.1
12% 27.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 59%
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP4000GM30013 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2075 2104 2102 2148 2154 2080 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 1,903
Write 2,083
Mixed 1,926
SusWrite 2,111
454% 2,006 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 74.4
232% 80 MB/s
DQ Read 754
DQ Write 549
DQ Mixed 693
507% 665 MB/s
Poor: 246%
This bench: 307%
Great: 634%
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP4000GM30013 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2069 2078 2090 2085 2089 2070 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 1,446
Write 2,027
Mixed 1,786
SusWrite 2,080
417% 1,835 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 77.5
243% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 769
DQ Write 523
DQ Mixed 709
512% 667 MB/s
Poor: 246%
This bench: 290%
Great: 634%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7AFR4N-UH 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 57.6
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 46.3
146% 51 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 125%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 3R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 10% 88 287 203 60 27.9" 4096 2160 GSM76E7 31MU97
History: Score 23: 2R 3G 4B | Score 27: 3R 3G 3B
Typical Z840 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: HP Z840 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback