Asrock G965M-S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock G965M-S  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '21 at 21:52
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E6500-$97
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 39.1
2-Core 80.2
44% 65.6 Pts
4-Core 81.3
8-Core 80.2
11% 80.8 Pts
64-Core 79.2
5% 79.2 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
MSI(1462 2201) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.26% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 6.6
6% 8.03 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8.1
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.26%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 13 12 13 30 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 84
Write 76.3
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 31.4
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 46%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
6GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 3.4 3.5 3.1 3 3.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Read 20.8
Write 11
Mixed 5
SusWrite 3.7
11% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.88%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 3R 6G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 11% 103 162 123 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical G965M-S Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock G965M-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $47
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback