Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	6.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH551
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200720
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 21:51
Run Duration	281 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Memory 92.1 1-Core 145 2-Core 286 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 519 8-Core 834 83% 677 Pts	64-Core 1,058 66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2009) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6.11% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 128 Parallax 9.1 5% 47.8 fps	MRender 11.3 Gravity 7.5 Splatting 11.8 8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.11% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CA5-8D512 512GB 2,452 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 396GB free (System drive) Firmware: CQ20903 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1469 1558 629 632 624 633 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	233% Outstanding	Read 1,583 Write 1,964 Mixed 1,407 SusWrite 924 331% 1,470 MB/s	4K Read 53.7 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 69.5 230% 78.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,117 DQ Write 757 DQ Mixed 420 453% 764 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 233% Great: 234%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB 69,946 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 23.2 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 38.8 SC Mixed 25.9 79% 27.7 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 17: 3R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
17%	11%	45	105	4	300	15.5"	1536 864	AUODE8E

History: Score 5: 1R 0G 0B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 17: 3R 0G 2B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 Builds (Compare 1,303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	1,303x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	504x
RTX 2080S (Super Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 93%, 3,436 samples	397x
RTX 2070S (Super Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 86%, 3,561 samples	379x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	311x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	202x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	148x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	651x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	172x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16