Gigabyte GA-EP45T-UD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EP45T-UD3P  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '21 at 19:57
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 37.8
2-Core 75.2
43% 63.5 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 150
16% 127 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 39.7
Parallax 32.3
27% 35.1 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 30.3
27% 33.1 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$95
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 206 202 209 215 213 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.4% Good
Read 223
Write 216
Mixed 212
SusWrite 203
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 37.7
123% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 44
DQ Write 71.1
DQ Mixed 55.5
43% 56.9 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.8% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 22" 1280 720 ACI22A2 VW222
Typical GA-EP45T-UD3P Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP45T-UD3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback