Medion MD34257/C794

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion MD34257/C794  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B360H4-EM
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '21 at 16:14
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 85.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 708
75% 600 Pts
64-Core 716
44% 716 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.4% Excellent
Lighting 98.9
Reflection 111
Parallax 100
81% 103 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 98.4
Splatting 99.4
80% 97.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
539GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 431 435 427 431 428 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 413
Mixed 385
SusWrite 425
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 44
145% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 329
248% 332 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 104%
Great: 128%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$95
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 890 412 287 276 271 279 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,264
Write 1,580
Mixed 1207
SusWrite 403
250% 1,113 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 58.7
197% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,262
DQ Write 968
DQ Mixed 975
767% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 186%
Great: 237%
Maxtor STM3250820AS 250GB
142GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 65.7
Write 28.6
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 66.3
37% 50 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.2% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 21
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 21.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 2R 4G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 24% 34 291 203 60 27.9" 2194 1234 AUS28B1 ASUS VP28U
Typical MD34257/C794 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Medion MD34257/C794

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $333
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback