Samsung R530/R730/R540

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSamsung R530/R730/R540  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG R530/R730/R540
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100621
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 24 '21 at 14:20
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 116
49% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 159
21% 159 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C06A) 730MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.42% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.4
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.42%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM321HI 320GB-$40
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 62 79 81 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 86.5
Write 83.7
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 74.7
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CF8 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 533 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical R530/R730/R540 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung R530/R730/R540

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback