Asus Z9NA-D6C

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Z9NA-D6C (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9NA-D6C
Memory	58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131108
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 13:57
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2 50 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket-B2 1356, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	66% Good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 82.7 2-Core 152 61% 103 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 616 54% 461 Pts	64-Core 1,860 115% 1,860 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 37C2) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 110 Parallax 125 101% 119 fps	MRender 172 Gravity 123 Splatting 104 105% 133 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90 12,565 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 444 446 450 451 450 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 483 Write 458 Mixed 433 SusWrite 447 103% 455 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 42.6 142% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 302 227% 305 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 131%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 1.5TB free Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 237 239 240 240 240 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	73.9% Very good	Read 247 Write 231 Mixed 225 SusWrite 239 53% 235 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 40.3 130% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 192 144% 192 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK 4x16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4 of 6 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.4% Above average	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 16.8 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.6 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	144	27"	1280 720	AUS27AF VG278

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9NA-D6C Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus Z9NA-D6C

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2450 01stBench 58%, 75 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2470 01stBench 63%, 77 samples	1x
Xeon E5-2407 0IntelBench 54%, 184 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	2x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x
Radeon HD 3800ATIBench 5%, 3,400 samples	1x

SSD
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	2x
SSD2SC120GE2DA08B-T 120GBPNYBench 65%, 109 samples	1x

RAM
HMT151R7BFR4C-H 6x4GBHynixBench 41%, 3 samples	2x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S 6x8GBCrucialBench 67%, 5 samples	2x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-P 6x8GBHynixBench 79%, 2 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16