Asus P8H67

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67 (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130718
Uptime	8.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 10:07
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	49%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 86.9 2-Core 157 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 318 39% 297 Pts	64-Core 320 20% 320 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 137 Parallax 128 103% 130 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 130 Splatting 116 97% 118 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 45 90 107 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 347 Write 179 Mixed 202 SusWrite 85 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 13.4 74% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 27.3 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 16.1 27% 50 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 72%
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 118GB free Firmware: 04.06A00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 152 157 157 158 155 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Read 139 Write 141 Mixed 86.9 SusWrite 151 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1.6 332% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB 832 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	47.6% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	6	60	27"	1280 720	ACI27F6 ASUS VE278

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	165x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	115x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	104x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	67x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	36x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	20x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	18x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	16x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $430

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16