Asrock Z590 Steel Legend WiFi 6E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z590 Steel Legend WiFi 6E  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '21 at 06:20
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 88.3
1-Core 190
2-Core 384
116% 221 Pts
4-Core 767
8-Core 1,457
132% 1,112 Pts
64-Core 1,832
113% 1,832 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 116%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
XFX(1EAE 6601) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 134
Parallax 295
111% 188 fps
MRender 226
Gravity 140
Splatting 167
144% 178 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 118%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 110 121 104 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
64% Good
Read 385
Write 121
Mixed 109
SusWrite 109
40% 181 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 20.8
112% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 48.8
77% 151 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64%
Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
29GB free
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 93 79 79 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
63% Good
Read 264
Write 117
Mixed 156
SusWrite 84.4
34% 155 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 33.8
141% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 77.2
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 91.2
71% 95.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63%
Great: 73%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 111 111 111 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 112
Write 109
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 110
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
465GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 126 127 127 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 114
Write 120
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 127
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 70%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 110 111 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 90.5
SusWrite 109
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 67%
WD 3200BEV External 320GB
66GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 30.3
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 13
33% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 20%
WD Elements 1TB
704GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 29.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 12.9
32% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 43%
Mobile disk by philips 160GB
19GB free, PID 201f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.9% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 17.8
Mixed 28
SusWrite 12.7
29% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Golden Empire CL16-20-20 D4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 23.1
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 30.6
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 4R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 27% 22 256 96 60 7.2" 1920 1080 GSM0001 LG TV
History: Score 24: 3R 3G 0B | Score 26: 4R 2G 0B
Typical Z590 Steel Legend WiFi 6E Builds (Compare 955 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z590 Steel Legend WiFi 6E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $883
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback