Asrock H110M-DVP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H110M-DVP  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160301
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateAug 14 '17 at 16:21
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 182
63% 112 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 324
38% 294 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Sapphire(174B E147) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 12.8
12% 12.8 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 12.7
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0724D Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 496
Write 145
Mixed 222
63% 288 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 30.3
107% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 59.8
81% 151 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 90%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
507GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 65
Write 64.5
Mixed 68.5
50% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.17
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.16
41% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 58%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 19.9
Mixed 16.3
27% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.86
4K Write 0.59
4K Mixed 0.35
39% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.5% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-DVP Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $206
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback