Ga-b85m GA-B85M

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	90.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Ga-b85m GA-B85M (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte B85M-D3H
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130527
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 00:47
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 103 2-Core 176 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 566 55% 453 Pts	64-Core 558 34% 558 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.3% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 163 Parallax 110 93% 129 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 99.2 Splatting 91.4 86% 107 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512MBF-1AN1ZABHA 512GB 1,497 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 320GB free (System drive) Firmware: M603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 389 386 387 385 390 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Read 416 Write 372 Mixed 319 SusWrite 388 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 97 4K Mixed 33.2 132% 51.7 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 237 202% 296 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 110%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 322GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 103 104 107 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 156 Write 143 Mixed 83.6 SusWrite 106 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial ST102464BA160B.16F 2x8GB 1,015 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.4% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 16.6 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 17.3 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 60: 6R 7G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
60%	45%	49	204	25	144	24"	1920 1080	BNQ7F31 BenQ XL2411Z

History: Score 42: 4R 5G 7B | Score 60: 6R 7G 9B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B85M Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 72%

Battleship

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

System: Ga-b85m GA-B85M

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	7x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	4x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	3x
GTX 660-TiNvidia $362Bench 26%, 42,960 samples	2x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	2x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	2x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x
MTFDDAK512MBF-1AN1ZABHA 512GBCrucialBench 92%, 1,497 samples	2x

RAM
FLGG45F-D8WMB 2x8GBKingmaxBench 49%, 52 samples	4x
ST102464BA160B.16F 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 1,015 samples	3x
2x8GBZIEMD316002308C11Bench 41%, 2 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $575

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16