Clevo W76OC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemClevo W76OC  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO W760C
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100715
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 24 '21 at 00:41
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6000
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 51.2
1-Core 46.5
2-Core 85.3
37% 61 Pts
4-Core 87.6
8-Core 89.4
12% 88.5 Pts
64-Core 86.9
5% 86.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Clevo(1558 0771) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.38%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 120GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0212B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 54 51 53 52 52 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.5% Below average
Read 241
Write 211
Mixed 114
SusWrite 75.2
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 6.4
49% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 17.5
41% 85.9 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 109%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
9GB free, PID 0077
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
6.62% Terrible
Read 22.9
Write 10.5
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 10.6
17% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.62%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDDDEDDDDEDDEDDDED 4444 DEDDDDDDDDDDDDDEED 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.7% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 7.4
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W76OC Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo W76OC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback