Biostar A10N-9830E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Biostar A10N-9830E (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191230
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 17:56
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR) 4,052 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 41 1-Core 58.4 2-Core 105 39% 68.2 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 187 25% 187 Pts	64-Core 184 11% 184 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G-1101 256GB 6,320 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20240001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 183 155 154 233 352 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 893 Write 983 Mixed 805 SusWrite 205 162% 722 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 67.7 4K Mixed 42.4 139% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 312 230% 306 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 188%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB 18,723 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 100 100 103 139 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Read 177 Write 146 Mixed 69.9 SusWrite 120 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 460% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 1x16GB 455 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.9% Poor	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 10.5 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 7.6 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 198 20% 198 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	6	4	64	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A10N-9830E Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A10N-9830E

CPU
FX-9830P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 40%, 4,052 samples	58x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	33x
RX 6500-XTAMD $140Bench 50%, 2,413 samples	4x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x

SSD
S700 250GBHP $46Bench 66%, 9,815 samples	4x
PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-256G-1101 256GBWDCBench 129%, 5,242 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 1x8GBCorsairBench 43%, 8,400 samples	6x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 43%, 3,974 samples	3x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 15% - Very poor

Total price: $46

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16