Huanan Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHuanan Default string  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-TF
Memory40.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 23 '21 at 15:22
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 192
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 703
65% 542 Pts
64-Core 973
60% 973 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.1% Poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 36
22% 25.4 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 62.5
Splatting 17.3
23% 28.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS2280P4 512GB
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 521 1395 1423 1408 1422 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,622
Write 1,368
Mixed 380
SusWrite 1,067
247% 1,109 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 35.6
173% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 55.7
104% 210 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 194%
Great: 261%
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: KQ000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 128 128 127 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 180
Write 181
Mixed 77
SusWrite 128
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 0.7
7% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17%
Great: 20%
Hitachi HTE541010A9E680 1TB
335GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 60 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 84.5
Write 87.3
Mixed 32
SusWrite 59.6
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 59%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
388GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 109 110 109 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59% Above average
Read 97
Write 93.7
Mixed 66
SusWrite 108
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59%
Great: 65%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
73GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 61 62 64 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 60
Write 52.5
Mixed 38
SusWrite 62
39% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 3x16GB
3 of 16 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (82nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 37
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 30.1
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 20.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 45: 6R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 28% 53 114 88 60 27.2" 3072 1728 GSM7707 LG HDR 4K
History: Score 20: 4R 0G 0B | Score 45: 6R 3G 6B
Typical Default string Builds (Compare 945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Huanan Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback